Showing posts with label man booker international prize. Show all posts
Showing posts with label man booker international prize. Show all posts

Thursday, March 19, 2009

14 of the Best

The longlist for the Man Booker International prize, awarded every two years to a writer for their contribution to fiction on the world stage, has been announced. The contenders this time round are :
Peter Carey (Australia)

Evan S Connell (USA)

Mahasweta Devi (India)

EL Doctorow (USA)

James Kelman (UK)

Mario Vargas Llosa (Peru)

Arnošt Lustig (Czech Republic)

Alice Munro (Canada)

VS Naipaul (Trinidad/India)

Joyce Carol Oates (USA)

Antonio Tabucchi (Italy)

Ngugi Wa Thiong'O (Kenya)

Dubravka Ugresic (Croatia)

Ludmila Ulitskaya (Russia)
Says Chair of Judges Jane Smiley, she and co-judges Amit Chaudhuri and Andrey Kurkov :
... all read books by authors we had never heard of before and they have turned out to be some of the best books we’ve ever read. ... It makes me wonder who else is out there untranslated into English.
Who's your money on this time?

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Pain and Dysfunction

The gathering of the title is in fact a wake which draws back together the scattered members of a dysfunctional Irish family.

Liam Hegarty has committed suicide by walking into the sea at Brighton with stones in his pocket, and his sister Veronica, closest to him in age, closest to him emotionally, takes upon herself the task of bringing the body home. But confronting the death of her alcoholic brother creates a crisis in her too, and brings her to the point of breakdown.

There is much in her own life she must take apart and examine, beginning with the anger has long harboured towards her parents for their feckless fecundity. The strain of continuous childbirth (they had a total of twelve children from nineteen pregnancies, a large number even by the standard of Irish Catholic families) leaves Veronica’s mother unable to properly function mentally to the extent that she cannot even remember her daughter’s name. Veronica is hurt and angry at this apparent amnesia, angry too at the way the children were themselves forced into a parenting role and had to bring each other up.

She and Liam were farmed out to their grandmother, Ada, when their mother was no longer able to cope with them, and she realises that it was here that something happened which fundamentally changed Liam’s nature and planted the seeds of despair that lead to his slide into alcoholism and subsequent suicide. Was he sexually abused? She struggles to uncover memories which she has suppressed for decades, not always sure if the images which fill her mind are accurate representations of what actually happened – or perhaps didn’t happen.

Most novels play out the past in flashbacks which make memory appear to be an instantly accessible video with every detail rendered distinctly. This is of course not at all how our minds work, and Enright shows how an apparently solid memory of an event has to be modified in the light of objective evidence. “I don’t know if I have the correct picture in my mind,” she says, and talks of “shifting stories and waking dreams” which she must sift through to find the truth.

“One of my strongest memories of Liam is him peeing through a wire fence” she says at one point, only to discover later in the novel that the fence was made of railings. If she can be wrong about small details, can she be so certain about the bigger picture?

The novel also deals with the way that pain and dysfunction can be passed on from generation to generation. Veronica cannot make sense of what happened in her grandmother’s house without making sense of the strange love triangle in which her grandmother found herself? Yet she has no access to that except through imaginative reconstruction.

The Gathering is perhaps the bravest and the most innovative of the novels which made it to the Booker shortlist, but with its exploration of death and loss and family pain it is often an unsettling read.

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Achebe Honoured

I'm very happy to see Nigerian author Chinua Acebe honoured with this year's Man Booker International Prize worth £60,000 .

Says John Ezard in the Guardian:
In choosing to give the award to a man who is regularly described as the father of modern African literature, the judges have signalled that this new global Booker has achieved the status of an authentic world award in only its second contest.

By honouring Achebe they have redressed what is seen in Africa - and beyond - as the acute injustice that he has never received the Nobel prize, allegedly because he has spent his life struggling to break the grip of western stereotypes of Africa. One of his most famous essays is an onslaught against Joseph Conrad's masterpiece Heart of Darkness, a novel about a European's descent into savagery in Africa.
The Guardian website also has a guide to Achebe's life and work and you can read an extract from Things Fall Apart (which is one of my favourite novels) here.

Acebe himself says in the Times:
It was 50 years ago this year that I began writing my first novel, Things Fall Apart. It is wonderful to hear that my peers have looked at the body of work I have put together in the last 50 years and judged it deserving of this important recognition. I am grateful.
It has, of course, been an amazing week for Nigerian authors (and not just Nigerian - Igbo!) with Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie winning the Orange Prize a few days earlier. In an interview with Stephen Moss in the Guardian she talks about the need to get right away from stereotyped views of Africa:

We have a long history of Africa being seen in ways that are not very complimentary, and in America ... being seen as an African writer comes with baggage that we don't necessarily care for. Americans think African writers will write about the exotic, about wildlife, poverty, maybe Aids. They come to Africa and African books with certain expectations. I was told by a professor at Johns Hopkins University that he didn't believe my first book ... because it was too familiar to him. In other words, I was writing about middle-class Africans who had cars and who weren't starving to death, and therefore to him it wasn't authentically African. ... People forget that Africa is a place in which class exists," she says. "It's as if Africans are not allowed to have class, that somehow authenticity is synonymous with poverty and demands your pity and your sympathy. Africa is seen as the place where the westerner goes to sort out his morality issues. We see it in films and in lots of books about Africa, and it's very troubling to me.

You may remember that Doreen Baigana said something very similar some time back.

Thank goodness for all those authors, Achebe in the forefront, who have managed to break the mould.

Friday, April 13, 2007

Weighing the Best of the Best

The Man Booker International Prize was set up to recognise one writer for his or her achievement in fiction and is awarded once every two years to a living author who has published fiction either originally in English or whose work is generally available in translation in the English language.

The winner of the inaugural Man Booker International Prize in 2005 was Ismail Kadaré.

The Judges List for the 2007 prize (which is awarded every second year) was announced at Massey College in Toronto on Thursday. The nominees are:
Chinua Achebe
Margaret Atwood
John Banville
Peter Carey
Don DeLillo
Carlos Fuentes
Doris Lessing
Ian McEwan
Harry Mulisch
Alice Munro
Michael Ondaatje
Amos Oz
Philip Roth
Salman Rushdie
Michel Tournier
Several of my most deeply loved authors are on this list (Atwood, Carey, Lessing, Ondaatje, de Lillo, Achebe), along with others I greatly respect (McEwan, Banville, Rushdie, Munro), others I haven't read yet but hope to (Fuentes, Oz) ... and a couple I've never heard of (Michel Tournier and Harry Mulisch) but who no doubt thoroughly deserve to be there.

(Much more information on all the writers and their works and is available on the Man Booker International website and also on the Guardian website.)

My feelings on seeing the list are mixed ... while I'm always glad to see great writers given the recognition they deserve, I hate the crassness of this winner and loser approach. And does the world actually need this award? Those of us who truly love reading know who the greats are already ... and how do you compare one in any meaningful way with another? You can't put their works on a scale and weight them as if they were trout caught in a fishing competition!

The judges, Nadime Gordimer, Colm Toibin and Professor Elaine Showalter have their work cut out for them but I know that whatever choice they make I will be disappointed.

But if I were in their shoes (and allowing for the great gaps of ignorance in my reading) ... I'd have to choose either Carey or Atwood ...

(*pause for deep thought*)

Carey ... Carey it is ...

Postscript:

Stuart Kelly writing in the Scotsman ( found via Literary Saloon) sees the award as being one for "resting on laurels", he says:
Rather than being a truly international survey of the best in contemporary fiction writing, this shortlist positively reeks of smug complacency and petty parochialism. How widely did the judges actually read? Did they even consider Ngugi wa'Thiong'o, Bernardo Atxaga, Mo Yan, Jan Kjærstad, Viktor Pelevin, Elias Khoury? What about recent Nobel Prize winners - Orhan Pamuk, Elfriede Jelinek, Imre Kertész, José Saramago, Gao Xingjian?

Literature in translation is difficult to persuade people to try; and the International Man Booker did present a real opportunity to widen horizons and promote the underappreciated - an opportunity it singularly failed to seize this year. Worse, it seems to me that at this present historical moment, the need for us to understand other cultures, engage in dynamic dialogue with them and foster genuine international communication is more pressing than eve

Saturday, February 19, 2005

Super Booker Shortlist

The shortlist's out for the new international Man Booker Prize. Eighten heavyweights from 13 counties. 5 of the nobel laureates, two of the Booker winners. Most of 'em I've read at least something by, four I've never heard of (my vast ignorance again, as no doubt Susan will be on hand to remind me!) - but I guess the great value of a prize like this is that it sets you on the trail of new and exciting reading.(Find it most odd, incidentally, that Rushdie is not on this list when Midnight's Children has been voted the Booker of Bookers.)

I would love to see the annual Man Booker prize become an international competition. Would love to see American writers compete on an even playing field and on an ongoing basis with British and Commonwealth writers and works in translation.

So who do you think will win in this competition? I hope it's Doris Lessing, who has written three of my all time favorite books The Grass is Singing, The Good Terrorist and The Golden Notebook. Margaret Atwood would be my second choice.