Thursday, September 22, 2005

Stick To Your Novel Writing, Mr. Rushdie

Beware of simplistic answers to the world's ills, Giles Fraser warns Salman Rushdie in the Guardian. He believes that Rushdie the novelist has increasingly been overtaken by his public crusading. He should stick to his original vocation because the novelist is in a unique position to enable us to appreciate different viewpoints.
... these dangerous times require the moral imagination of the novel as much as ever. And this in two specific respects: first, in the capacity of the novel to be more humble than the pamphleteer with regard to ideology; and second, in its capacity to listen to and be affected by moral worlds very different from one's own."
Nicely argued.

Just one problem: do the people who need heart and opinion transplants actually read novels?

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sharon,

This made me swear off Rushdie.

http://www.the-tls.co.uk/this_week/story.aspx?story_id=2111914

Spot on.

Thank you Mr Roth.

bibliobibuli said...

Thanks so much for posting this link, Irman. I thought this paragraph particularly interesting:

"If Rushdie really believes that novels make nothing happen, he concedes far too much for the sake of his own freedom. True, a work of art does not become valuably subversive simply by trying to be so, but novelists may change our lives and this isn’t just humanist bromide: Azar Nafisi’s recent memoir, Reading “Lolita” in Tehran (2003), shows how a Muslim woman in Iran can find reading Nabokov and Henry James as valuable, liberating and counter-cultural an experience as reading The Satanic Verses."

Anonymous said...

People are so easily swayed by what other people think and say.