Showing posts with label dickens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dickens. Show all posts

Monday, June 09, 2008

Great Desk-pectations

Charles Dickens' mahogany writing desk and walnut chair, handed down through the family, sold for just over $850,000 at auction at Christie's last week. The proceeds go to the Great Ormond Street children's hospital in London.

The buyer, Tom Higgins, made his millions as CEO of a psychic readings business, but plans to use the desk where Dickens penned Great Expectations, to write letters.

Friday, November 02, 2007

Jones' Homage to Dickens

“Characters migrate” reads the epithet by Umberto Eco at the beginning of Mr. Pip, the novel by New Zealander Lloyd Jones which pays homage to the way can profoundly enrich and change our lives.

The coming-of age story is narrated by Mathilda, whom we first meet as a thirteen-year old, living on the South Pacific island of Bougainville. It is the early 1990’s and the islanders find themselves caught-up in a bloody civil war between the forces of the government of Papua New Guinea and rebels, which include the men and boys of Mathilda’s village

The island’s white occupants have fled, all except for the eccentric and down-at-heel Mr. Watts who volunteers to keep the school open. Dubbed Pop-Eye by the children, Watts has long been considered a figure-of fun by the children who regularly witness the spectacle of him wearing a clown’s red nose, and pulling behind him a cart on which stands his utterly mad, yet regal wife, Grace.

On the second day of school, Jones begins to read to the children from Charles Dickens’ classic novel Great Expectations. And although the book was written a hundred and fifty years before and by someone living a world away, and some of the words give them difficulty, the children find that Watts has given them “a piece of the world” that they can escape to.

Although Mathilda, in particular, finds a friend in Pip, she finds that her love of the book brings her increasingly into conflict with her proud mother, Dolores, who feels her own authority and moral certainty undermined. Afraid that her daughter is being seduced by the white world to which she has already lost her husband, she steals and hides the book. This act imperils all the villagers when government troops come looking for a certain Mr. Pip whose name they have seen written in the sand. When they do not find him, cruel retribution swiftly follows.

Dickens’ novel, meanwhile, is painstakingly reconstructed by the children from fragments of memory with Watts’ help.

Perhaps the most persuasive attestation to the power of story-telling comes later in the novel when Watts plays a latter-day Scherazade to calms a group of drugged and dangerous rebel soldiers. He offers them the story of his life which he weaves from Dickens novel, his own history, and the magical stories about the meaning of things that the islanders have told him. The scene in which Watts and Grace write their own histories on the wall of the spare-room, so that their baby will have a choice of which cultural elements to make her own, is extremely moving, and reminds us that when our own culture comes into contact with another, each of us has the power to decide what parts of it we will accept as our own and which reject.

Like Dickens’ character Pip, Mathilda is forced by circumstances to reinvent herself. Years later, now an Australian citizen, and post-graduate student of literature specializing in “Dickens’ Orphans”, she makes a journey to New Zealand to uncover the truth about Watts, the man who so deeply influenced her life.

Lloyd Jones doesn’t put a foot wrong in this luminous novel, and it is not surprising that it has won this year’s Commonwealth prize.

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Dickensville

In an aptly titled piece in the Guardian, Simon Swift asks What the Dickens?, referring to the £62m Dickens World theme park which is due to open in Chatham, Kent at the end of May.

It is described as:
... an exciting indoor visitor complex themed around the life, books and times of one of Britain’s best loved authors, Charles Dickens. It will take visitors on a fascinating journey through Dickens’ lifetime as they step back into Dickensian England and are immersed in the urban streets, sounds and smells of the 19th century.
And it boasts the following attractions:
... one of Europe’s largest dark boat rides, the Haunted house of Ebenezer Scrooge, a state-of-the art animatronic show, Victorian School Room, 4D high definition show and Fagin’s Den.
Is this an exciting way of bringing literature alive or just another great British monument to tackiness? (I confess a deep affection for all things tacky, and I firmly believe that Malaysia does tacky with a great deal more style than the Brits. Look no further than Sunway Pyramid!)

And on behalf of Britain's Tourist Board, if you were in UK on your hols, would you make a special journey to go and see Dickens World?

Meanwhile, on the Guardian blog Judith Flanders worries that the social issues that Dickens cared so much about could be trivialised, while Lindesay Irvine runs away with the idea of the turning other writers' works into theme park material. (Any one up for a nice family day out at Kafka's Castle?) Flanders has invited readers to say what authors they think should get the theme park treatment, and one commenter could well have a workable proposal for Harry Potter Land! (Oops, too late, dear!)

The closest I've come to proposing the tacky and materialistic exploitation of any author's work is this though.

(While writing this post I was haunted by the memory of an article I read, but not unfortunately blogged, last year about the rebuilding of Hardy's Wessex in China. Would be grateful for help in tracking it down.)

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

It's A Crime!

If Dickens were alive today he would be writing genre fiction or churning out soaps for TV.
Discuss with reference to at least five episodes of CSI London.

Okay, okay I'm being completely fascetious. I'm as guilty as anyone. of not taking genre fiction as seriously as that which we dub *"literary fiction" a.k.a. the real stuff, the hardcore.

The Guardian yesterday quite rightly rapped my pretentious knuckles:
What is it, when Man Booker juries meet, that makes genres "inferior"? ... Why is crime writing, with its "very conscious structure" and ability to raise "big moral issues" outside the box of introversion, such a poor relation of "literary fiction"?
Truth is, a "very conscious structure" to me reeks of predictability and formulaic writing.

Give me genre fiction that subverts the genre and I will be thrilled. Just as I'm thrilled to read the "literary" novel which breaks new ground.

Give me an elegantly turned plot, language that's so rich I want to drink it, characters I can care about, deeper issues to keep me awake at night just wondering, wondering. And I won't care what kind of fiction you call it.

There are crime writers who manage it. Patricia Highsmith's The Talented Mr. Ripley, for example, caught me completely off balance - how does she get the reader to side with the truly despicable Ripley? Yet we do. And in the process are forced to confront our own definitions of "moral behaviour".

Yet I really don't think it's true to say there is no genre fiction on Booker shortlists - it's just that the kind of authors who make it that far tend to play with the narrow definitions of genre. Is Margaret Atwood's The Blind Assassin science fiction or detective story? Both and more.

Atwood has also written some of the best "speculative" fiction (i.e. sci-fi that could happen) - the chilling Oryx and Crake (nightmares free of charge) and The Handmaid's Tale (so prophetic in it's vision of the religious extremism sweeping America).

Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell on last year's shortlist wraps a story within a story within a story and incorporates several genres - thriller, fantasy, comedy ... and each one superb.

Julian Barnes Arthur and George is a historical novel which is also centres on the solving of a crime.

Susanna Clarke's Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell was not only shortlisted for the Booker but also also bagged the Hugo award for science ficition writing and the Mythopoetic award for fantasy.

In the end it isn't so much a choice between Literary fiction and genre, as between the straightforward and fomulaic and the multilayered and surprising.

I know which I'd rather have!

(*By the way, hadn't really realised until Tash's talk at Silverfish that American fiction does not recognise such artificial distinctions.)


Postscript:

Even deep-end litfic types dabble in genre. The Elegant Variation has the news that Banville is headed in that direction next.